From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f43.google.com (mail-lf1-f43.google.com [209.85.167.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFC51C5783; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724772282; cv=none; b=h6ffmNwXLLu5BHf/hpnQ4RQMC89INCDNQFznVTp4+/Vu2YB1uztBrEp12Y1KX7HbPEDcMvVg+15zfJaGgKHOXT9FVkNoepAgLS86SnhuYDMp/bap11bLyjs8GG5DeY3kDAGVEiCZVpd5qxua/q2A+yjnCre12QEj371+VzA9k7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724772282; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YQ2VG2DYOB80viZEe5vmkUS0nQMT8d50waYYo97gKDM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pLc/kIC2r6r2Y+iQ7baiS4VJkkU9/HQmw5+BcHC2Okf3ribHaf+gjQQH8LVSM5LX08AEj3+M10pL+Gq4N+R+vx1xnAuF87PRVRkdKbLOfu1qIHWsMkqZG85omHtT7NDh8sJEj6iDSggE4ojBULG69Q2Ws0Ew2d4JaBxq7We/F5A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=kGHgnwUA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kGHgnwUA" Received: by mail-lf1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-533461323cdso6432164e87.2; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:24:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724772279; x=1725377079; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5+3AhCX+ZJlKziiTtmYukdp7nOWfib5WaN8umHYwjNM=; b=kGHgnwUA8rDbifE6CSeLybERnaV+OJUI6XaY7gW831M09T48b0IwTRucAg26v/p2Ou 8KqLix3w3ehQUbjXmgGBDOmoWzOXtp/zFmMoThRkjMPsiXWCrlHaaad3zFNcvGuuqfjN StdLWrCbIvKQ1GMPvC7zDglbWf5jx7LnUms8GxUfaSccp1pYbR8CB9sniNfnGnKNdDwQ yq2ewVN/aZ7tsKrFly+ZRCn4cCCjiKWXJjc7BUFGMTRxROSKDR4rADkse2OmzhsRGgjn RzC6PFVhDkI6N2mJ4arsRanoOFu87WyjWc5TFb6fiEmFx0j3GPFSlUQJR9yKcitEqGwT V11g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724772279; x=1725377079; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5+3AhCX+ZJlKziiTtmYukdp7nOWfib5WaN8umHYwjNM=; b=H2ahzvFnCnwnSUog5OPFtIQylUAaRap0jLFi0Db/iRbfSar6bCPKOdSJhA6Z+sR6J1 ZDeH/h3JlTD0NMNchB3WoX1jifC60iKVq7HR3PsMSNcjt+/Fl2HTSxli11qywo68KPsT WMMyV46quCgHP/h+Lvi7sdKNY4Lr673dJr8cBFBAJRied0drm8XLy0ZOcsh0GsFpTCWv iWdZA2HK3RnuzotMGQ9SL2PQ+OjwB+uOAR8hNh5spyNloqtFmVD6ryxMn3rSMOT5fQKZ 5YkWIH8S1RzmdWk/VhDEwu5wHvTYuW1dVMrdOftBC9nZGg9P8D4gTIZ9lHEM5wcnSaH0 QoQg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWVRrqTnPtaubxGrTFMR3LvsvJq1yLwVipkNgaZsyaRzkvpssy+WuKETEZ7EFX9bUic9F5UJoV271yusZvQ@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCX46MgojIFseqQLmTMgCVemTt3UmlM1B+ogdIvPxZqiO0h+l/fXQNG6ZKAUKCD+2QVrMXuBdO7rkKI2@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwxR0XrTnCiEl2cYu4uoxvEmYN2tQlCePHjztmVzMlC2Ffrg7QW vaPAovQClNAX8jLMjy7fp5fOORJMGvmH+s/CklaLuFqEfzu+I/Lc X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6eAaVS0g91zaL8EKcj3HOTk8vY8xhM7k1eoix4HsI/20/Uae50383wAdhbyY8fhBzSbDc4Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6cf:b0:52c:e0fb:92c0 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5343883abdfmr8530719e87.34.1724772278344; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.235.83.196] (nieman.control.lth.se. [130.235.83.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-5334ea59474sm1800442e87.150.2024.08.27.08.24.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1037bb5a-a48f-47cb-ace7-5e0aba7c6195@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:24:36 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to a24cae8fc1f1 To: Chandan Babu R Cc: dchinner@redhat.com, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, kjell.m.randa@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, wozizhi@huawei.com References: <877cc2rom1.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> Content-Language: en-US From: Anders Blomdell In-Reply-To: <877cc2rom1.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Since 6.10 is still marked as a stable release, maybe this shold go into 6.10-fixes branch as well? Dave Chinner (1): [95179935bead] xfs: xfs_finobt_count_blocks() walks the wrong btree /Anders On 2024-08-27 17:05, Chandan Babu R wrote: > Hi folks, > > The for-next branch of the xfs-linux repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git > > has just been updated. > > Patches often get missed, so please check if your outstanding patches > were in this update. If they have not been in this update, please > resubmit them to linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org so they can be picked up in > the next update. > > The new head of the for-next branch is commit: > > a24cae8fc1f1 xfs: reset rootdir extent size hint after growfsrt > > 9 new commits: > > Darrick J. Wong (6): > [e21fea4ac3cf] xfs: fix di_onlink checking for V1/V2 inodes > [5335affcff91] xfs: fix folio dirtying for XFILE_ALLOC callers > [410e8a18f8e9] xfs: don't bother reporting blocks trimmed via FITRIM > [6b35cc8d9239] xfs: use XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL for daddrs in getfsmap code > [16e1fbdce9c8] xfs: take m_growlock when running growfsrt > [a24cae8fc1f1] xfs: reset rootdir extent size hint after growfsrt > > Dave Chinner (1): > [95179935bead] xfs: xfs_finobt_count_blocks() walks the wrong btree > > Zizhi Wo (2): > [68415b349f3f] xfs: Fix the owner setting issue for rmap query in xfs fsmap > [ca6448aed4f1] xfs: Fix missing interval for missing_owner in xfs fsmap > > Code Diffstat: > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 14 +++-- > fs/xfs/scrub/xfile.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c | 36 ++++-------- > fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c | 30 ++++++++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++----- > 6 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)