Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: buffer cache
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:13:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063689231.788.63.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFF20A09E8.52CAFEDE-ON87256DA2.007AD80B-88256DA2.007C8EA9@us.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 15:41 -0700, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> >> But if you accept the idea that a module writer can write his own make 
> >> file, then he is free to organize the source code in original ways, use a 
> >> language other than C, and share code or structure with non-Linux 
> >> applications (e.g. device drivers for the same device in other OSes).
> >
> >Um, I think the point is that no one does accept that idea.
> 
> I think that's a bit of an overstatement.

I accept the idea. I also accept the idea that said module writer can
also write all his own include files _too_, and avoid even having to
have a kernel tree around at all. 

I think he'd have to be on crack, but I do accept that he _can_ do that.

But I don't want him asking for support, and I don't want him advocating
this practice to newbies.

Do what you like in the privacy of your own home; I really couldn't give
a monkey's. Just don't talk about it in public :)

-- 
dwmw2



  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-16  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-13  8:51 buffer cache vadiraj c s
2003-09-13 10:27 ` Jan Hudec
2003-09-13 13:14   ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-13 17:25   ` Bryan Henderson
2003-09-13 17:28     ` Jan Hudec
2003-09-14  9:32       ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-14 10:03         ` Jan Hudec
2003-09-14 10:37           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-14 11:19             ` Jan Hudec
2003-09-15 16:18             ` Bryan Henderson
2003-09-15 16:35               ` Greg KH
2003-09-15 22:41                 ` Bryan Henderson
2003-09-16  5:13                   ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-09-16 10:18                     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-16 12:16                       ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1063689231.788.63.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hbryan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox