From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
To: adilger@clusterfs.com
Cc: tzachar@cs.bgu.ac.il, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, bulb@ucw.cz,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: srfs - a new file system.
Date: 24 Oct 2003 14:24:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067027088.16779.4.camel@patehci2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031024141146.O17778@schatzie.adilger.int>
> > a one to 10^gazillion chance of this happening,
>
> So, system stabilizes when there are no files left ;-).
Anyone have a measure of how often these events actually do occur?
What little I've seen people say of how they design file and RAID
systems speaks as if HDD's reliably chose either to read back what you
wrote to them or else reported an error.
What about when the HDD actually reads back something else?
How can we know how commonly that occurs in practice, so that we can
know how often we're wrong to believe such things as our locally
recorded vector time?
Pat LaVarre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-24 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-07 4:11 fs test suite Pat LaVarre
2003-10-07 14:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-07 14:59 ` Zachary Peterson
2003-10-07 17:16 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-07 18:54 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-10-07 18:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-07 19:26 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-10-20 9:12 ` srfs - a new file system Nir Tzachar
2003-10-20 21:00 ` Eric Sandall
2003-10-21 12:07 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-21 14:29 ` Brian Beattie
2003-10-21 16:59 ` Jan Harkes
2003-10-23 13:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-24 9:28 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-22 4:57 ` Erik Andersen
2003-10-22 10:16 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-22 14:22 ` Jan Harkes
2003-10-23 7:50 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-23 12:33 ` Jan Hudec
2003-10-23 20:12 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-10-24 9:21 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-24 12:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-24 19:14 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-24 14:38 ` Jan Harkes
2003-10-24 19:16 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-24 20:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-24 20:24 ` Pat LaVarre [this message]
2003-10-24 20:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-24 20:52 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-10-24 21:00 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-24 21:22 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-10-24 23:03 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-25 0:23 ` Bryan Henderson
2003-10-25 10:37 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-24 21:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-24 20:53 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-25 8:01 ` Jan Hudec
2003-10-22 10:21 ` Nir Tzachar
2003-10-25 9:27 ` Implementing writepage Charles Manning
2003-10-25 16:18 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-25 22:40 ` Charles Manning
2003-10-26 10:25 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-26 15:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-26 18:47 ` Mark B
2003-10-26 20:40 ` Charles Manning
2003-10-26 21:04 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-26 20:54 ` Charles Manning
2003-10-27 8:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-10-27 8:39 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 8:43 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-10-27 8:46 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 8:52 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-10-27 9:06 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 9:08 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1067027088.16779.4.camel@patehci2 \
--to=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzachar@cs.bgu.ac.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox