From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: Implementing writepage Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:46:44 +0000 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1067244402.15551.258.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <20031025092152.D638B6D5B@blood.actrix.co.nz> <1067098698.3266.19.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> <16284.55463.520076.541516@laputa.namesys.com> <1067243966.15551.256.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <16284.55985.863779.2130@laputa.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: manningc2@actrix.gen.nz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.86.99.235]:14721 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261347AbTJ0Iqr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 03:46:47 -0500 To: Nikita Danilov In-Reply-To: <16284.55985.863779.2130@laputa.namesys.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 11:43 +0300, Nikita Danilov wrote: > By write(2)? May be I am missing something in this discussion, though. Either your commit_write() is synchronous or it does what writepage() would do anyway... which is to start the I/O but not wait for it. -- dwmw2