From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat LaVarre Subject: Re: vfs whitebox test Date: 25 Nov 2003 08:46:22 -0700 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1069775182.6929.14.camel@patrh9> References: <1069716562.4649.14.camel@patrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:13789 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262758AbTKYPq4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:46:56 -0500 Received: from royntex01.iomegacorp.com (unknown [147.178.90.120]) by email.iomega.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085EC1E90 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:46:56 -0700 (MST) To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1069716562.4649.14.camel@patrh9> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org > Anybody already pull together some more closely interactive way of > trying creative patterns of calls thru the vfs layer? >>From the linux-fsdevel 2003-10-07 archives "Re: fs test suite", we know possibilities, perhaps sorted now from most to least accessible, include: http://ltp.sourceforge.net/ http://www.iozone.org http://www.connectathon.org/ http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cruft/ http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ http://www.google.com/search?q=postmark+linux http://www.google.com/search?q=bonnie+linux By now I can testify that at a glance these particular links do Not say if they point only to ways of running up in the stratospheric layer of open/ read/ write/ close, or not. Pat LaVarre