From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which dentry a page belongs to
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:26:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082759212.1854.6.camel@zaphod> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040423213747.GA8915@mail.shareable.org>
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 22:37 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Shaya Potter wrote:
> > right, I know i can do that (or on lookup(), or on open() ) but that
> > basically limits me to a open/close transaction for versioning. Can't
> > ioctl the fs, and cause all future writes to be in a new version.
>
> "all future writes" is not very well defined with shared writable mappings.
>
> Imagine this:
>
> 1. program write to a page, dirty bit is set in pte
>
> [6 weeks later...]
>
> 2. you do the ioctl
> 3. your writepage gets called
>
> Now you will store an update for a change which happened 6 weeks
> before you called the ioctl(). Is that what you really wanted?
> Perhaps it is.
OK, great example, now I see the problem which can't be easily solved.
update-data
ioctl
update-data
writepage()
writepage can't differentiate b/w data b4 and data after, so only way to
do it would be to force a sync b4 ioctl is called, which I would think
(perhaps wrong) should write out all the data to disk. But unsure if
prorgramatically able to really test to see if it worked or not.
shaya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-23 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 14:57 which dentry a page belongs to Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 15:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-23 15:42 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 16:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-23 16:52 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-23 17:18 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 17:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-23 17:32 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 17:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-23 17:59 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 22:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-23 18:05 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-23 21:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-23 22:26 ` Shaya Potter [this message]
2004-04-23 22:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-25 5:23 ` Shaya Potter
2004-04-25 23:22 ` Erez Zadok
2004-04-24 8:53 ` Jan Hudec
2004-04-24 8:44 ` Jan Hudec
2004-04-24 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-24 9:32 ` Jan Hudec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082759212.1854.6.camel@zaphod \
--to=spotter@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox