From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe Saout Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:47:53 +0200 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1093549673.13881.21.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-brU/Ba8UpTtJ3XVzV7xm" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Diego Calleja , jamie@shareable.org, vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, christer@weinigel.se, spam@tnonline.net, akpm@osdl.org, wichert@wiggy.net, jra@samba.org, reiser@namesys.com, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: Received: from websrv2.werbeagentur-aufwind.de ([213.239.197.240]:17829 "EHLO websrv2.werbeagentur-aufwind.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269513AbUHZTsM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:48:12 -0400 To: Rik van Riel In-Reply-To: List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org --=-brU/Ba8UpTtJ3XVzV7xm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 15:44 -0400 schrieb Rik van Riel: > > Hey, think of it as a wave-particle duality. Both "modes" exist at the > > same time, and cannot be separated from each other. Which one you see > > depends entirely on your "experiment", ie how you open the file. >=20 > Guess I'm scared again now. We need to make sure that > backup programs don't fall victim to the uncertainty > principle ;) At least you can be sure that the backup will go into a defined state as soon as you observe it. --=-brU/Ba8UpTtJ3XVzV7xm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBLj5pZCYBcts5dM0RAjhjAJ4nYlhMWuuTiZJ8exdOYnttttdRxQCdH+dI wNq8PpxDGnX1Tm/CxUZv+b4= =KJzi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-brU/Ba8UpTtJ3XVzV7xm--