From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:57:26 -0400
Message-ID: <1093553846.5678.102.camel@krustophenia.net>
References: <412CEE38.1080707@namesys.com> <20040825200859.GA16345@lst.de>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408251314260.17766@ppc970.osdl.org>
	 <20040825204240.GI21964@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408251348240.17766@ppc970.osdl.org>
	 <20040825212518.GK21964@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <20040826001152.GB23423@mail.shareable.org>
	 <20040826003055.GO21964@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <20040826010049.GA24731@mail.shareable.org>
	 <20040826100530.GA20805@taniwha.stupidest.org>
	 <20040826110258.GC30449@mail.shareable.org>  <412E06B2.7060106@pobox.com>
	 <1093552705.5678.96.camel@krustophenia.net>
	 <1093553429.13881.48.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Will Dyson <will_dyson@pobox.com>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,  Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX <flx@namesys.com>,  ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-20803-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
To: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
In-Reply-To: <1093553429.13881.48.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 16:50, Christophe Saout wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 16:38 -0400 schrieb Lee Revell:
> 
> > > It has always bugged me that Gnome and KDE implement their own VFS layers. 
> > 
> > Same here.  This always seemed like something the kernel should be able
> > to handle.  It seems to me that if reiser4 had been available at the
> > time the Gnome and KDE developers would not have needed to do this.
> 
> Well, the kernel doesn't have a filesystem that speaks http, scp and
> those things. GnomeVFS is URL-based. It has some pseudo-protocols that
> extract a pseudo directory-tree for all installed applications + the
> changes the used made, created on the fly from a set of XML files that
> are read-only and system-wide and the user-overridden changes. I don't
> know if all of these things would really make sense inside the kernel.
> 

True.  FWIW, I never use most of those features.  It's just too damn
slow.  Windows seems to implement all of the useful features of
GnomeVFS, and they are 10x faster.

Lee