linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] O_DIRECT reads and writes without i_sem
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:56:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1099328209.23475.98.camel@watt.suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041101160844.GA29251@infradead.org>

On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 16:08 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:32:07AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:

> > Right now, O_DIRECT reads and writes on regular files have to take i_sem
> > while reading file metadata in order to make sure we don't race with
> > hole filling.
[ ... ]
> This gets too complicated for it's own sake.  What about going down the
> XFS route and making i_sem a r/w semaphore that's taken only shared
> during read and write I/O, but exclusive while setting up write I/O
> outside of i_size?  Alternatively just move the I/O locking into the
> filesytem.
> 

Nod, it is too complex, this is why I posted early ;)  The only place in
the FS specific code for the locking I added to fs/direct-io.c would be
in each filesystem get_blocks call.  I went for direct-io.c because
that's where all the other locking already was.  shrug.

If we do down_read(i_rw_sem) for all cases except growing the file, then
we still have no locking for O_DIRECT while we are filling holes in the
file.  The filesystem write function could do this:

	down_read(i_rw_sem)
	read fs metadata
	if (filling hole) {
		up_read(i_rw_sem)
		down_write(i_rw_sem)
		goto retry
	}

But it also gets nasty in a hurry.  The second alternative is just to
make O_DIRECT lock pages (or stub pages if they aren't in cache) in the
filesystem address space, but this might add significant overhead in
radix tree operations during O_DIRECT.

-chris



  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-01 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-01 15:32 [PATCH RFC] O_DIRECT reads and writes without i_sem Chris Mason
2004-11-01 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-01 16:56   ` Chris Mason [this message]
2004-11-05 18:06   ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1099328209.23475.98.camel@watt.suse.com \
    --to=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).