From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] O_DIRECT reads and writes without i_sem
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:56:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1099328209.23475.98.camel@watt.suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041101160844.GA29251@infradead.org>
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 16:08 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:32:07AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Right now, O_DIRECT reads and writes on regular files have to take i_sem
> > while reading file metadata in order to make sure we don't race with
> > hole filling.
[ ... ]
> This gets too complicated for it's own sake. What about going down the
> XFS route and making i_sem a r/w semaphore that's taken only shared
> during read and write I/O, but exclusive while setting up write I/O
> outside of i_size? Alternatively just move the I/O locking into the
> filesytem.
>
Nod, it is too complex, this is why I posted early ;) The only place in
the FS specific code for the locking I added to fs/direct-io.c would be
in each filesystem get_blocks call. I went for direct-io.c because
that's where all the other locking already was. shrug.
If we do down_read(i_rw_sem) for all cases except growing the file, then
we still have no locking for O_DIRECT while we are filling holes in the
file. The filesystem write function could do this:
down_read(i_rw_sem)
read fs metadata
if (filling hole) {
up_read(i_rw_sem)
down_write(i_rw_sem)
goto retry
}
But it also gets nasty in a hurry. The second alternative is just to
make O_DIRECT lock pages (or stub pages if they aren't in cache) in the
filesystem address space, but this might add significant overhead in
radix tree operations during O_DIRECT.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-01 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-01 15:32 [PATCH RFC] O_DIRECT reads and writes without i_sem Chris Mason
2004-11-01 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-01 16:56 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2004-11-05 18:06 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1099328209.23475.98.camel@watt.suse.com \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).