From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Re: fishy ->put_inode usage in ntfs Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:43:38 +0000 Message-ID: <1109753018.12379.0.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> References: <20041014112607.GA24508@lst.de> <1097757569.21275.40.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20041014125933.GA26021@lst.de> <1097760404.21275.52.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20050210104719.GA2771@lst.de> <1108046439.12000.9.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20050210144254.GA7222@lst.de> <1108046906.12000.16.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20050210145003.GA7399@lst.de> <1108047572.12000.24.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20050213163512.GA3686@lst.de> <1109719075.28414.19.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , ntfs-dev , fsdevel Received: from ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.132]:42912 "EHLO ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262225AbVCBInu (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:43:50 -0500 To: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <1109719075.28414.19.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 23:17 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 20:44 +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > So every time we get a concurrent clear_inode() and iget() for the same > > inode what happens? We get your "Failed to get bitmap attribute." every > > time? Or can clear_inode only be called once the inode is removed from > > icache? > > I thought we declared that the concurrent clear_inode() and read_inode() > were a VFS bug, and fixed it? It's even fixed in 2.4 now isn't it? Is it? I must have missed this discussion. )-: Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/