From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: O_NONBLOCK for regular files Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:56:30 -0700 Message-ID: <1113371790.9903.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <405C0DC0.3E61994@melbourne.sgi.com> <1113353153.1956.481.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Filesystem Development List , Al Viro , Neil Brown , Linux NFS Mailing List Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:45811 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261375AbVDMF4s (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:56:48 -0400 To: Greg Banks In-Reply-To: <1113353153.1956.481.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org on den 13.04.2005 Klokka 10:45 (+1000) skreiv Greg Banks: > There's now a patch to actually do it, see > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-nfs&m=111087383132762&w=2 > > Does anyone want to give a firm yea or nea to this approach? I'd > really like to get this patch moving in the pipeline. Nay... if (rqstp->rq_vers == 3) is BAD! We're already busy with rq_vers == 4 (which has the same issues). This sort of condition needs to be handled in a more version-independent manner. Cheers, Trond -- Trond Myklebust