From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 21:21:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1116534113.12012.509.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> References: <20050512033100.017958f6.akpm@osdl.org> <4284BF66.1050704@friservices.com> <1116008021.23972.28.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <42854F34.2070806@friservices.com> <1116410791.20667.5.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <428B6A76.9000708@friservices.com> <1116521133.23972.247.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <428CD2F4.3020104@friservices.com> <1116525877.23972.255.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <428CF310.50400@friservices.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dedekind@infradead.org, Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mason@suse.com Return-path: Received: from baythorne.infradead.org ([81.187.226.107]:7879 "EHLO baythorne.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261243AbVESUWB (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2005 16:22:01 -0400 To: steve@friservices.com In-Reply-To: <428CF310.50400@friservices.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 15:12 -0500, Steve Roemen wrote: > No, I am not using ACLs. I am running the 2.6.12-rc3 with those two > patches, and I can't get it to error out. OK, then it sounds like what you've seen is a manifestation of the already-known reiserfs breakage in 2.6.12-rc4. Artem's patch didn't cause it; it just made it show itself. Thanks. -- dwmw2