From: Ram <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, jamie@shareable.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:45:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116665101.4397.71.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DZP37-0006hH-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 01:09, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Enclosed the simplified patch,
>
> Looks much better :)
>
> I still see a problem: what if old_nd.mnt is already detached, and
> bind is non-recursive. Now it fails with EINVAL, though it used to
> work (and I think is very useful).
I am not getting this comment. R u assuming that a detached mount
will have NULL namespace? If so I dont see it being the case.
Or am I missing some subtle point?
> When doing up_write(...) you don't have to keep the order, just check
> if the namespaces are not equal for the second up_write().
Yes. saves atleast 2 lines.
>
> And why don't you do this:
>
> if (old_ns < mntpt_ns)
> down_write(&old_ns->sem);
>
> instead of this
>
> if (old_ns < mntpt_ns) {
> down_write(&old_ns->sem);
> }
Will do. Saves another few lines. :)
I will send out the new patch once I understand your first comment.
RP
>
> Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-21 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-20 22:11 [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces Ram
2005-05-21 6:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 7:26 ` Ram
2005-05-21 8:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 8:45 ` Ram [this message]
2005-05-21 9:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 10:07 ` Ram
2005-05-21 13:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-22 20:25 ` Ram
2005-05-22 20:51 ` Ram
2005-05-23 5:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-23 7:24 ` Ram
2005-05-23 8:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 9:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 13:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-22 8:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-22 17:04 ` [RFC][PATCH] /proc/dead_mounts support (Was: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across ...) Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-22 21:10 ` [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces Ram
2005-05-23 5:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 0:39 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 5:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 7:13 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 8:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 17:09 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 17:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 17:44 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 17:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 18:04 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-30 19:06 ` Ram
2005-05-24 9:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 17:15 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 17:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 18:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-24 18:33 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 21:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-21 13:43 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1116665101.4397.71.camel@localhost \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).