From: Ram <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: jamie@shareable.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:10:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116796229.4397.117.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DZlVn-0007a6-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 01:08, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > I still see a problem: what if old_nd.mnt is already detached, and
> > > bind is non-recursive. Now it fails with EINVAL, though it used to
> > > work (and I think is very useful).
> >
> > Hey, you just made another argument for not detaching mounts when the
> > last task with that current->namespace exits, but instead detaching
> > mounts when the last reference to any vfsmnt in the namespace is dropped.
> >
> > Hint :)
>
> I have a better idea:
>
> - create a "dead_mounts" namespace.
> - chain each detached mount's ->mnt_list on dead_mounts->list
> - set mnt_namespace to dead_mounts
> - export the list via proc through the usual mount list interface
>
> The last would be a nice bonus: I've always wanted to see the list of
> detached, but not-yet destroyed mounts.
>
> Does anybody see a problem with that?
Yes. :) because I will have to change my 'rbind across namespace' patch
because now detached mounts will have dead_mounts namespace instead of
null namespace.
RP
>
> Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-22 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-20 22:11 [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces Ram
2005-05-21 6:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 7:26 ` Ram
2005-05-21 8:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 8:45 ` Ram
2005-05-21 9:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 10:07 ` Ram
2005-05-21 13:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-22 20:25 ` Ram
2005-05-22 20:51 ` Ram
2005-05-23 5:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-23 7:24 ` Ram
2005-05-23 8:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 9:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-21 13:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-22 8:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-22 17:04 ` [RFC][PATCH] /proc/dead_mounts support (Was: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across ...) Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-22 21:10 ` Ram [this message]
2005-05-23 5:07 ` [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 0:39 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 5:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 7:13 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 8:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 17:09 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 17:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 17:44 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 17:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 18:04 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-30 19:06 ` Ram
2005-05-24 9:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 17:15 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 17:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-24 18:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-24 18:33 ` Mike Waychison
2005-05-24 21:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-21 13:43 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1116796229.4397.117.camel@localhost \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).