From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Badari Pulavarty Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC] [PATCH 2/4]delayed allocation for ext3 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:25:13 -0700 Message-ID: <1121732713.6025.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1110839154.24286.302.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <1121622041.4609.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050718014743.GB6427@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mingming Cao , ext2-devel , Andrew Morton , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, suparna@in.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu Return-path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:29392 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261763AbVGSAcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:32:39 -0400 To: Andreas Dilger In-Reply-To: <20050718014743.GB6427@schatzie.adilger.int> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:47 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jul 17, 2005 10:40 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > > @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ struct ext3_inode { > > #define EXT3_MOUNT_BARRIER 0x20000 /* Use block barriers */ > > #define EXT3_MOUNT_NOBH 0x40000 /* No bufferheads */ > > #define EXT3_MOUNT_QUOTA 0x80000 /* Some quota option set */ > > + #define EXT3_MOUNT_DELAYED_ALLOC 0xC0000 /* Delayed Allocation */ > > This doesn't make sense. DELAYED_ALLOC == QUOTA | NOBH? My fault. I will fix it. > > > + {Opt_delayed_alloc, "delalloc"}, > > Is this a replacement for Alex's delalloc code? We also use delalloc for > that code and if they are not interchangeable it will cause confusion > about which one is in use. > Well, basically "delalloc" concept is same - whether we use it on current ext3 layout or with new extent layout doesn't matter. > > + if (test_opt(sb, DELAYED_ALLOC)) { > > + if (!(test_opt(sb, DATA_FLAGS) == EXT3_MOUNT_WRITEBACK_DATA)) { > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "EXT3-fs: Ignoring delall option - " > > + "its supported only with writeback mode\n"); > > Should be "ignoring delalloc option". Yep. Thanks, Badari