From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace inode_update_time with file_update_time
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:52:29 -0500
Message-ID: <1131400349.8063.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20051029165209.GA26446@lst.de>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511072126420.13960@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, akpm@osdl.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from opus.cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.20.100]:37624 "EHLO
	opus.cs.columbia.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S965127AbVKGVwq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:52:46 -0500
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511072126420.13960@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 21:40 +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > To allow various options to work per-mount instead of per-sb we need
> 
> What are those various options?  Please spell them out.  (I mean it!  I 
> really do not know what you have in mind and I cannot see anything that 
> would require a vfs mount wrt cmtime updates.)

I'm thinking you should think of things like read only bind mounts,
where even meta data wont be updated.