From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: a1426z@gawab.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:59:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132149576.8155.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1EcIVw-0005ZH-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:19 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > This is why we have "pivot_root()" and "chroot()", which can both be used
> > > to do what you want to do. You mount the new root somewhere else, and then
> > > you chroot (or pivot-root) to it. And THEN you do 'chdir("/")' to move the
> > > cwd into the new root too (and only at that point have you "lost" the old
> > > root - although you can actually get it back if you have some file
> > > descriptor open to it).
> >
> > Wouldn't this constitute a security flaw?
> >
> > Shouldn't chroot jail you?
>
> No, chroot should just change the root.
>
> If you don't want to be able to get back the old root, just close all
> file descriptors _in addition_ to chroot() and chdir().
hah. As long as you're running as root, chroot() again to a directory
below you, and you effectively broken the chroot and can make a relative
path to the old root. :)
I created a patch years ago that creates a chain of "chroot" points, and
any past chroot point would be considered a place that follow_dotdot
would consider a root. There didn't seem much interest in the patch
though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-08 2:01 [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind Al Viro
2005-11-08 14:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-08 15:48 ` Ram Pai
2005-11-08 15:55 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-09 18:44 ` Ram Pai
2005-11-09 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-09 19:26 ` Al Viro
2005-11-09 19:28 ` Ram Pai
2005-11-16 3:29 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-16 3:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-16 5:35 ` Al Boldi
2005-11-16 8:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-16 9:10 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-16 10:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-16 13:59 ` Shaya Potter [this message]
2005-11-16 16:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-16 20:05 ` Al Boldi
2005-11-16 20:21 ` Shaya Potter
2005-11-16 8:47 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-16 8:41 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-16 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-09 10:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-09 14:31 ` Al Viro
2005-11-09 15:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-09 15:56 ` Al Viro
2005-11-09 16:33 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1132149576.8155.23.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=spotter@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).