From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert S Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] loop.c to use write ops for fs requiring special
	locking
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:04:57 -0600
Message-ID: <1142031897.27533.40.camel@technetium.msp.redhat.com>
References: <1141231737.15117.88.camel@technetium.msp.redhat.com>
	 <20060301140902.53350bb6.akpm@osdl.org>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603021002001.15033@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46495 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752194AbWCJW7e (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:59:34 -0500
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603021002001.15033@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:16 +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> It is simply that it is faster on all file systems that can use 
> prepare_write/commit_write and the "performance hungry" would have 
> complained if it were to be removed.
(snip)
> 	Anton

Having heard no objections to my loop.c patch, when can I expect it to
be integrated into the 2.6 kernel?

Regards,

Bob Peterson