From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: xattr namespace question
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:13:10 -0600
Message-ID: <1143123190.11010.3.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com>
References: <1142942773.6400.1212.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com>
	 <20060321122119.GN6199@schatzie.adilger.int> <20060321235828.GB6846@frodo>
	 <1143018426.6400.1230.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com>
	 <20060322085949.GA5965@infradead.org>
	 <20060323084331.A714226@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
	 <20060323120428.GA10774@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
	a.gruenbacher@bestbits.at, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:6624 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932146AbWCWONp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:13:45 -0500
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234])
	by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2NEDYkM001755
	for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:13:34 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k2NEDNYw248686
	for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:13:23 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2NEDMon001299
	for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:13:22 -0500
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060323120428.GA10774@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 12:04 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:43:31AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > re: JFS - yeah I thought that too, but yesterday looking at
> > mainline there doesn't seem to be an ioctl handler in their
> > file_operations struct...?
> 
> the patches are very recent, looks like they're not in mainline yet.

Right.  Very recent.  They are in the mainline post-2.6.16, and have
been in the last few -mm kernels (since 2.6.16-rc4-mm2)

Shagy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center