linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] GFS2: File and inode operations
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:53:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145886796.3856.161.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060423075525.GP6075@schatzie.adilger.int>

Hi,

On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 01:55 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2006  17:13 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > This also includes a new header file, iflags.h which is designed to
> > abstract the (originally ext2 only, but now used by many different fs)
> > get/set flags ioctl by having one central place in which to register
> > filesystem flags. Given favourable reviews, I'll submit some patches to
> > update the other fileststems to define their flags in terms of those
> > in iflags.h. Note that this doesn't change the interface of the other
> > filesystems since the values of the flags are identical to those
> > previously defined.
> > 
> > To the best of my knowledge, GFS2 is the only filesystem which requires
> > the addition of flags above and beyond those defined by ext2/3 so if
> > there are others and we've clashed with them, please let me know.
> 
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/iflags.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
[some constants snipped for brevity]
> > +
> > +#define __IFL(x) (1<<(iflag_##x))
> > +#define IFLAG_SECRM		__IFL(SecureRm)		/* 0x00000001 */
> > +#define IFLAG_UNRM		__IFL(Unrm)		/* 0x00000002 */
> > +#define IFLAG_COMPR		__IFL(Compr)		/* 0x00000004 */
> > +#define IFLAG_SYNC		__IFL(Sync)		/* 0x00000008 */
> > +#define IFLAG_IMMUTABLE		__IFL(Immutable)	/* 0x00000010 */
> > +#define IFLAG_APPEND		__IFL(Append)		/* 0x00000020 */
> > +#define IFLAG_NODUMP		__IFL(NoDump)		/* 0x00000040 */
> > +#define IFLAG_NOATIME		__IFL(NoAtime)		/* 0x00000080 */
> > +#define IFLAG_DIRTY		__IFL(Dirty)		/* 0x00000100 */
> > +#define IFLAG_COMPRBLK		__IFL(ComprBlk)		/* 0x00000200 */
> > +#define IFLAG_NOCOMP		__IFL(NoComp)		/* 0x00000400 */
> > +#define IFLAG_ECOMPR		__IFL(Ecompr)		/* 0x00000800 */
> > +#define IFLAG_BTREE		__IFL(Btree)		/* 0x00001000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_INDEX		__IFL(Index)		/* 0x00001000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_IMAGIC		__IFL(Imagic)		/* 0x00002000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_JOURNAL_DATA	__IFL(JournalData)	/* 0x00004000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_NOTAIL		__IFL(NoTail)		/* 0x00008000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_DIRSYNC		__IFL(DirSync)		/* 0x00010000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_TOPDIR		__IFL(TopDir)		/* 0x00020000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_DIRECTIO		__IFL(DirectIO)		/* 0x00040000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_INHERITDIRECTIO	__IFL(InheritDirectIO)	/* 0x00080000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_INHERITJDATA	__IFL(InheritJdata)	/* 0x00100000 */
> > +#define IFLAG_RESERVED		__IFL(Reserved)		/* 0x80000000 */
> 
> Actually, the 0x0080000 flag has been reserved by e2fsprogs for ext3
> extents for a while already.  AFAICS, there are no other flags in the
> current e2fsprogs that aren't listed above.
> 
So if I call that one IFLAG_EXTENT, then I presume that will be ok?
What about the 0x00040000 flag? That would seem to be a gap in the
sequence (ignoring GFS flags for now), so should I leave that reserved
for use by ext2/3 as well?

> The other tidbit is that new ext2/ext3 files generally inherit the flags
> from their parent directory, so it isn't clear if there is really a need
> for a distinction between DIRECTIO and INHERIT_DIRECTIO, and similarly
> JDATA and INHERIT_JDATA?  Generally, I'd think that JDATA isn't meaningful
> on directories (since they are metadata and journaled anyways), nor is
> DIRECTIO so their only meaning on a directory is "INHERIT for new files".
> 
> Cheers, Andreas

Yes, that sounds like a good plan. The only downside (purely from a GFS2
point of view, it won't affect anybody else) means that its no longer a
1:1 relationship between flags, so in order to do the conversion, I'd
have to use something a little more elaborate than the inline function I
added to the iflags.h header file,

Steve.




  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-24 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-21 16:13 [PATCH 05/16] GFS2: File and inode operations Steven Whitehouse
2006-04-23  7:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-04-24 13:53   ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2006-04-24 22:19     ` Andreas Dilger
2006-04-25  9:27       ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-04-25 10:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-25 11:14       ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-04-25 12:38         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1145886796.3856.161.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com \
    --to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).