From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peshehodov Andrey Subject: Re: reiser4 merging Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:59:52 +0400 Message-ID: <1145941192.4960.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: fresco_pap@mail.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx6.mail.ru ([194.67.23.26]:14727 "EHLO mx6.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbWDYE7Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:59:24 -0400 Received: from [81.20.100.115] (port=44871 helo=81.20.100.115) by mx6.mail.ru with asmtp id 1FYFdu-0005Az-00 for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:59:18 +0400 To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24/04/2006 at 09:22 -0700, Bryan Henderson wrote: > There's no reason it has to be done by NameSys; anyone who wants (a > variation of) reiser4 in the mainline kernel can do it. Yes, of course. But what concrete changes must bu made in reiser4 to it's merging? I would like to ask this questions somebody like Andrew Morton or Christoph Hellwig, but I "afraid" to digress them. May somebody answer me? --- Andrey.