From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 18:22:58 +0300 Message-ID: <1146756179.11422.8.camel@localhost> References: <20060504031755.GA28257@hellewell.homeip.net> <20060504033750.GD28613@hellewell.homeip.net> <84144f020605040751t2d2dca5ai4044f28d7118ee96@mail.gmail.com> <445A16B1.8080407@oktetlabs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Phillip Hellewell , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, mike@halcrow.us, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com, mcthomps@us.ibm.com, toml@us.ibm.com, yoder1@us.ibm.com, James Morris , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Erez Zadok , David Howells Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:53470 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbWEDPXB (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 11:23:01 -0400 To: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" In-Reply-To: <445A16B1.8080407@oktetlabs.ru> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Pekka Enberg wrote: > > So, what's wrong with BUG_ON? On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:58 +0400, Artem B. Bityutskiy wrote: > I guess because this may be compiled off when no debugging/extra > checking is needed. But you shouldn't write assertions that you don't really need anyway. Pekka