From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:21:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1149880865.22124.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Tomas , Andreas Dilger Return-path: To: Chase Venters In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Ar Gwe, 2006-06-09 am 13:50 -0500, ysgrifennodd Chase Venters: > It's about bundling. It's about being able to take your 3-year old > dependable car and make it faster by bolting on new manifolds and > turbochargers, rather than waiting a year for the manufacturer to release > a totally new model Unfortunately in the software case if you want it in the base kernel you are bolting new manifolds on everyones car at once, and someone is going to have an engine explode as a result. Ext3 already has enough back compatiblity that you can replace the engine with a horse, we don't need any more in it thank you. Alan