From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:05:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1149980709.7627.15.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> References: <20060610134645.GB11634@stusta.de> <20060610144228.GA6416@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Gerrit Huizenga , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Tomas , Andreas Dilger Return-path: To: Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20060610144228.GA6416@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 16:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > frankly, i'll leave that decision to the ext3 developers and obviously, > to distributors. Their filesystem has handled my data for 10 years, and > they have been very conservative about their technical choices > throughout. I trust them to not mess up this time either. That's my view in nut shell (minus distributors). Add caps. -Mike