From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:27:51 +0300 Message-ID: <1154024871.7190.6.camel@ubuntu> References: <1154012822.13509.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <84144f020607270833v4c981d00w8e3e643406aea7a@mail.gmail.com> <1154016589.13509.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1154017809.13509.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, tigran@veritas.com Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:17346 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750964AbWG0S1x (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:27:53 -0400 To: Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <1154017809.13509.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 17:30 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Actually that isn't true either - it takes care of *regular file* > writes. Devices will need a revoke hook and thats really probably only > right. If they don't have one just -EOPNOTSUPP, you can check it before > you begin any other processing so its easy to check. I have uploaded patch with ->revoke here: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/penberg/patches/2.6.18-rc2/revoke-system-call-V3.patch I'll post a new one to LKML after I am done other stuff probably next week. Pekka