From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:15:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1155039338.5729.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060805122936.GC5417@ucw.cz> <20060807101745.61f21826.froese@gmx.de> <84144f020608070251j2e14e909v8a18f62db85ff3d4@mail.gmail.com> <20060807224144.3bb64ac4.froese@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Edgar Toernig , Pekka Enberg , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, tigran@veritas.com Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:28603 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932470AbWHHL4a (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:56:30 -0400 To: Chase Venters In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Ar Llu, 2006-08-07 am 17:24 -0500, ysgrifennodd Chase Venters: > implementation is crude. "EBADF" is not something that applications are > taught to expect. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I can think of no > situation under which a file descriptor currently gets yanked out from > under your feet -- you should always have to formally abandon it with > close(). The file descriptor is not pulled from under you, the access to it is. This is exactly what occurs today when a tty is hung up. That could be almost any fd because paths could be symlinks to a pty/tty pair... In the tty case you get -ENXIO Alan