From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:26:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1157045173.11347.94.camel@localhost> References: <20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830125239.6504d71a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830193153.12446.24095.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <27414.1156970238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, steved@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > If Christoph acks them then I can send them to Trond or Linus, at Trond's > option. > > Or I can butt out, drop the patches, wait for them to turn up in Trond's > tree, at your option. I don't mind pulling them into my tree, but since Christoph had objections to earlier implementations, and specifically asked me to put a hold on the non-NFS related patches, then I'd first like an ACK from him stating that he is now happy with the way those objections have been handled in the updates. Cheers, Trond