From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:00:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1157130044.5632.87.camel@localhost> References: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830125239.6504d71a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830193153.12446.24095.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <27414.1156970238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <9534.1157116114@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060901093451.87aa486d.akpm@osdl.org> Reply-To: Linux filesystem caching discussion list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20060901093451.87aa486d.akpm@osdl.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 09:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > nfs automounter submounts are still broken in Trond's tree, btw. Are we stuck? You mean autofs indirect maps? I'll see if I can't get my hands on an selinux setup like yours in order to do some debugging. AFAICS, the non-selinux case works fine, though. Cheers, Trond