From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Ian Kent" <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and
 NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:49:43 +0800
Message-ID: <1157172583.9610.269973398@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20060830125239.6504d71a.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20060830193153.12446.24095.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<27414.1156970238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<9534.1157116114@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<20060901093451.87aa486d.akpm@osdl.org>
	<1157130044.5632.87.camel@localhost>
	<20060901195009.187af603.akpm@osdl.org>
Reply-To: Linux filesystem caching discussion list <linux-cachefs@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060901195009.187af603.akpm@osdl.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs>,
	<mailto:linux-cachefs-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-cachefs@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-cachefs-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs>,
	<mailto:linux-cachefs-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org


On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:50:09 -0700, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org> said:
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:00:44 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 09:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > nfs automounter submounts are still broken in Trond's tree, btw.  Are we stuck?
> > 
> > You mean autofs indirect maps?
> 
> I don't know that that is.
> 

The mount that Andrew is a "host" type mount.
autofs gets the host name as a key and is expected to mount all
filesystems exported from the host. It does this by attempting to
mounting each export in shortest to longest order (to take account
of nesting of the mounts).

Ian
Ian