From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: BUG dcache.c:613 during autofs unmounting in 2.6.19rc2 Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:59:04 +0800 Message-ID: <1161093544.4937.41.camel@localhost> References: <200610161658.58288.ak@suse.de> <1161058535.11489.6.camel@localhost> <200610171250.56522.ak@suse.de> <1161093310.4937.37.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:58281 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751019AbWJQN7L (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:59:11 -0400 To: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <1161093310.4937.37.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 21:55 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > Well it always worked this way in earlier kernels and even if the > > wrong module was suddenly used for some reason it shouldn't BUG. > > So something is broken. > > True. > > There have been some changes in this area (David Howells made some > changes which affected autofs4) and I'm not sure that the autofs module > was reviewed. I didn't look closely at it at the time, I guess I should > have. Sorry. > > It will take a while longer to work out if the autofs if open to the > same issue resulting from Davids change. Oh forgot .. I know it may be hard to do but could you try and confirm whether it was autofs or autofs4. They are very different and I don't want to stare at code trying to work out what's wrong if it's not broken. > > Ian >