From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:07:05 -0500 Message-ID: <1168362425.6054.41.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <20070108111852.ee156a90.akpm@osdl.org> <200701082051.l08KpV8b011212@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> <20070109122644.GB1260@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1168360778.6054.26.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20070109170426.GB23174@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Erez Zadok , Andrew Morton , Josef 'Jeff' Sipek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com, David Quigley Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:60066 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932252AbXAIRHe (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:07:34 -0500 To: Jan Kara In-Reply-To: <20070109170426.GB23174@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 18:04 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > But once you have MS_RDONLY set, there should be no modifications of > the underlying filesystem, should they? And I have understood that the > only problem is modifying the filesystem underneath unionfs. But maybe > I'm missing something. Remote filesystems. The MS_RDONLY bit on your client means bugger all to the server and all the other clients. Trond