From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" Subject: [PATCH 14/21] Unionfs: Document unionfs_d_release locking Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:54:05 -0400 Message-ID: <11761304552377-git-send-email-jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu> References: <11761304521844-git-send-email-jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:43993 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933669AbXDIOyc (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:54:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <11761304521844-git-send-email-jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek --- fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c index c841f08..4756b78 100644 --- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c +++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c @@ -286,6 +286,10 @@ static int unionfs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) return err; } +/* + * At this point no one can reference this dentry, so we don't have to be + * careful about concurrent access. + */ static void unionfs_d_release(struct dentry *dentry) { int bindex, bstart, bend; -- 1.5.0.3.268.g3dda