From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bryan J. Smith" Subject: Re: [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:38:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1184611089.6951.2.camel@portatux64.mobile.smithconcepts.com> References: <1184606132.4551.11.camel@portatux64.mobile.smithconcepts.com> <200707162040.00062.a1426z@gawab.com> <20070716174801.GM13826@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Al Boldi , Joshua Baker-LePain , David Chinner , Justin Piszcz , Jon Collette , linux-ide-arrays@lists.math.uh.edu, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070716174801.GM13826@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 11:48 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Wow, thanks for bringing an advocacy thread onto linux-fsdevel. Just what > we wanted. Do you have any insight into how to "get the data=ordered > onto the VFS level"? Because to me, that sounds like pure nonsense. First off, I have no idea who decided to respond to my post and CC: linux-fsdevel on it. In retrospect, secondly, I should have not posted my post to linux-raid in the first place (is that list now mirrored to linux-fsdevel or something?). I was just sharing in my frustration of the lack of XFS support by Red Hat. So, lastly and in any case, my apologies to all, even if I did not proliferate it to linux-fsdevel, it was probably not ideal for me to post such to anything on vger.kernel.org (like linux-raid) in the first place. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution