From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions v2 Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:41:23 -0500 Message-ID: <1189269683.6183.4.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> References: <46E27DEF.7060109@googlemail.com> <46E28351.8050900@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Oliver Neukum To: Michal Piotrowski Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:39597 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753424AbXIHQld (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:41:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46E28351.8050900@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 13:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc5. > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > FS > > Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : Oliver Neukum > Caused-By : ? > Handled-By : ? > Status : unknown Is this a regression? Oliver, Have you been using jfs on this flash previously? If so, what was the most recent kernel that didn't have problems? Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center