From: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org,
Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 12/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on dentry ops
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:09:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190776210952-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11907762042481-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index 52bcb18..3f3a18d 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
verify_locked(dentry);
/* if the dentry is unhashed, do NOT revalidate */
- if (d_deleted(dentry)) {
+ if (unlikely(d_deleted(dentry))) {
dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "unionfs: unhashed dentry being "
"revalidated: %*s\n",
dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name);
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
}
BUG_ON(dbstart(dentry) == -1);
- if (dentry->d_inode)
+ if (likely(dentry->d_inode))
positive = 1;
dgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_D(dentry)->generation);
sbgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_SB(dentry->d_sb)->generation);
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
* revalidation to be done, because this file does not exist within
* the namespace, and Unionfs operates on the namespace, not data.
*/
- if (sbgen != dgen) {
+ if (unlikely(sbgen != dgen)) {
struct dentry *result;
int pdgen;
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
/* Free the pointers for our inodes and this dentry. */
bstart = dbstart(dentry);
bend = dbend(dentry);
- if (bstart >= 0) {
+ if (likely(bstart >= 0)) {
struct dentry *lower_dentry;
for (bindex = bstart; bindex <= bend; bindex++) {
lower_dentry =
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
set_dbend(dentry, -1);
interpose_flag = INTERPOSE_REVAL_NEG;
- if (positive) {
+ if (likely(positive)) {
interpose_flag = INTERPOSE_REVAL;
/*
* During BRM, the VFS could already hold a lock on
@@ -97,14 +97,14 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
* (deadlock), but if you lock it in this function,
* then release it here too.
*/
- if (!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex)) {
+ if (unlikely(!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex))) {
mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
locked = 1;
}
bstart = ibstart(dentry->d_inode);
bend = ibend(dentry->d_inode);
- if (bstart >= 0) {
+ if (likely(bstart >= 0)) {
struct inode *lower_inode;
for (bindex = bstart; bindex <= bend;
bindex++) {
@@ -119,14 +119,14 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
UNIONFS_I(dentry->d_inode)->lower_inodes = NULL;
ibstart(dentry->d_inode) = -1;
ibend(dentry->d_inode) = -1;
- if (locked)
+ if (unlikely(locked))
mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
}
result = unionfs_lookup_backend(dentry, &lowernd,
interpose_flag);
- if (result) {
- if (IS_ERR(result)) {
+ if (likely(result)) {
+ if (unlikely(IS_ERR(result))) {
valid = false;
goto out;
}
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
dentry = result;
}
- if (positive && UNIONFS_I(dentry->d_inode)->stale) {
+ if (unlikely(positive && UNIONFS_I(dentry->d_inode)->stale)) {
make_bad_inode(dentry->d_inode);
d_drop(dentry);
valid = false;
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
BUG_ON(bstart == -1);
for (bindex = bstart; bindex <= bend; bindex++) {
lower_dentry = unionfs_lower_dentry_idx(dentry, bindex);
- if (!lower_dentry || !lower_dentry->d_op
- || !lower_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
+ if (unlikely(!lower_dentry || !lower_dentry->d_op
+ || !lower_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate))
continue;
/*
* Don't pass nameidata to lower file system, because we
@@ -164,14 +164,15 @@ static bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(struct dentry *dentry,
* invariants). We will open lower files as and when needed
* later on.
*/
- if (!lower_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(lower_dentry, NULL))
+ if (unlikely(!lower_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(lower_dentry,
+ NULL)))
valid = false;
}
- if (!dentry->d_inode)
+ if (unlikely(!dentry->d_inode))
valid = false;
- if (valid) {
+ if (likely(valid)) {
/*
* If we get here, and we copy the meta-data from the lower
* inode to our inode, then it is vital that we have already
@@ -200,32 +201,32 @@ bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
struct inode *lower_inode;
/* ignore if we're called on semi-initialized dentries/inodes */
- if (!dentry || !UNIONFS_D(dentry))
+ if (likely(!dentry || !UNIONFS_D(dentry)))
return false;
inode = dentry->d_inode;
- if (!inode || !UNIONFS_I(inode) ||
- ibstart(inode) < 0 || ibend(inode) < 0)
+ if (unlikely(!inode || !UNIONFS_I(inode) ||
+ ibstart(inode) < 0 || ibend(inode) < 0))
return false;
for (bindex = ibstart(inode); bindex <= ibend(inode); bindex++) {
lower_inode = unionfs_lower_inode_idx(inode, bindex);
- if (!lower_inode)
+ if (unlikely(!lower_inode))
continue;
/*
* We may want to apply other tests to determine if the
* lower inode's data has changed, but checking for changed
* ctime and mtime on the lower inode should be enough.
*/
- if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime,
- &lower_inode->i_mtime) < 0) {
+ if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime,
+ &lower_inode->i_mtime) < 0)) {
printk("unionfs: new lower inode mtime "
"(bindex=%d, name=%s)\n", bindex,
dentry->d_name.name);
show_dinode_times(dentry);
return true; /* mtime changed! */
}
- if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime,
- &lower_inode->i_ctime) < 0) {
+ if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime,
+ &lower_inode->i_ctime) < 0)) {
printk("unionfs: new lower inode ctime "
"(bindex=%d, name=%s)\n", bindex,
dentry->d_name.name);
@@ -293,7 +294,7 @@ bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd,
dtmp = dentry->d_parent;
dgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_D(dtmp)->generation);
/* XXX: should we check if is_newer_lower all the way up? */
- if (is_newer_lower(dtmp)) {
+ if (unlikely(is_newer_lower(dtmp))) {
/*
* Special case: the root dentry's generation number must
* always be valid, but its lower inode times don't have to
@@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd,
* and short lived, so locality will be better.
*/
chain = kzalloc(chain_len * sizeof(struct dentry *), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!chain) {
+ if (unlikely(!chain)) {
printk("unionfs: no more memory in %s\n", __FUNCTION__);
goto out;
}
@@ -364,7 +365,7 @@ bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd,
}
unionfs_unlock_dentry(chain[i]);
- if (!valid)
+ if (unlikely(!valid))
goto out_free;
}
@@ -373,7 +374,7 @@ out_this:
/* finally, lock this dentry and revalidate it */
verify_locked(dentry);
dgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_D(dentry)->generation);
- if (is_newer_lower(dentry)) {
+ if (unlikely(is_newer_lower(dentry))) {
/* root dentry special case as aforementioned */
if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
unionfs_copy_attr_times(dentry->d_inode);
@@ -399,7 +400,7 @@ out_this:
* which __unionfs_d_revalidate_one has incremented. Note: the "if"
* test below does not depend on whether chain_len was 0 or greater.
*/
- if (valid && sbgen != dgen)
+ if (unlikely(valid && sbgen != dgen))
for (bindex = dbstart(dentry);
bindex <= dbend(dentry);
bindex++)
@@ -425,7 +426,7 @@ static int unionfs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
unionfs_lock_dentry(dentry);
err = __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(dentry, nd, false);
unionfs_unlock_dentry(dentry);
- if (err > 0) { /* true==1: dentry is valid */
+ if (likely(err > 0)) { /* true==1: dentry is valid */
unionfs_check_dentry(dentry);
unionfs_check_nd(nd);
}
@@ -447,11 +448,11 @@ static void unionfs_d_release(struct dentry *dentry)
unionfs_check_dentry(dentry);
/* this could be a negative dentry, so check first */
- if (!UNIONFS_D(dentry)) {
+ if (unlikely(!UNIONFS_D(dentry))) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "unionfs: dentry without private data: %.*s\n",
dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name);
goto out;
- } else if (dbstart(dentry) < 0) {
+ } else if (unlikely(dbstart(dentry) < 0)) {
/* this is due to a failed lookup */
printk(KERN_DEBUG "unionfs: dentry without lower "
"dentries: %.*s\n",
@@ -466,7 +467,8 @@ static void unionfs_d_release(struct dentry *dentry)
dput(unionfs_lower_dentry_idx(dentry, bindex));
unionfs_set_lower_dentry_idx(dentry, bindex, NULL);
/* NULL lower mnt is ok if this is a negative dentry */
- if (!dentry->d_inode && !unionfs_lower_mnt_idx(dentry,bindex))
+ if (unlikely(!dentry->d_inode &&
+ !unionfs_lower_mnt_idx(dentry,bindex)))
continue;
unionfs_mntput(dentry, bindex);
unionfs_set_lower_mnt_idx(dentry, bindex, NULL);
--
1.5.2.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-26 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-26 3:09 [GIT PULL -mm] 00/25 Unionfs updates/cleanups/fixes Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 01/25] Unionfs: Simplify unionfs_get_nlinks Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 02/25] Unionfs: Remove unused #defines Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 03/25] Unionfs: display informational messages only if debug is on Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 8:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-26 14:01 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 15:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-26 15:28 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 04/25] Unionfs: cache-coherency fixes Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 05/25] Unionfs: cast page->index loff_t before shifting Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-26 13:44 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 06/25] Unionfs: minor coding style updates Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 07/25] Unionfs: add lower nameidata debugging support Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 08/25] Unionfs: lower nameidata support for nfsv4 Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 09/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on common fileops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 10/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on copyup ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 4:32 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-26 13:40 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 15:23 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-26 15:43 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 16:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-26 16:51 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 18:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 11/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on debug ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 21:34 ` roel
2007-09-26 3:09 ` Erez Zadok [this message]
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 13/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on dir ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 21:40 ` roel
2007-09-27 14:28 ` Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 14/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on headers Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 15/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on fileops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 16/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on inode ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 17/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on lookup ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 18/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on super ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 19/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on mmap ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:09 ` [PATCH 20/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on rename ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:10 ` [PATCH 21/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on readdir ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:10 ` [PATCH 22/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on common subr Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:10 ` [PATCH 23/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on unlink ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:10 ` [PATCH 24/25] Unionfs: add un/likely conditionals on xattr ops Erez Zadok
2007-09-26 3:10 ` [PATCH 25/25] Unionfs: use poison.h for safe poison pointers Erez Zadok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1190776210952-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--to=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).