From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1191055513.18147.97.camel@lappy> References: <20070919033605.785839297@sgi.com> <20070919033643.763818012@sgi.com> <200709280742.38262.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <1191002119.18147.80.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nick Piggin , Christoph Hellwig , Mel Gorman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Chinner , Jens Axboe To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:46430 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752190AbXI2It6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2007 04:49:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:20 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Really? That means we can no longer even allocate stacks for forking. I think I'm running with 4k stacks...