linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	sfrench@samba.org, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
Subject: Networked filesystems vs backing_dev_info
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:34:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193477666.5648.61.camel@lappy> (raw)

Hi,

I had me a little look at bdi usage in networked filesystems.

 NFS, CIFS, (smbfs), AFS, CODA and NCP

And of those, NFS is the only one that I could find that creates
backing_dev_info structures. The rest seems to fall back to
default_backing_dev_info.

With my recent per bdi dirty limit patches the bdi has become more
important than it has been in the past. While falling back to the
default_backing_dev_info isn't wrong per-se, it isn't right either. 

Could I implore the various maintainers to look into this issue for
their respective filesystem. I'll try and come up with some patches to
address this, but feel free to beat me to it.

peterz


             reply	other threads:[~2007-10-27  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-27  9:34 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-10-27 15:22 ` Networked filesystems vs backing_dev_info Jan Harkes
2007-10-27 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 21:02 ` Steve French
2007-10-27 21:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 21:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-28  7:46       ` Petr Vandrovec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1193477666.5648.61.camel@lappy \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).