From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
sfrench@samba.org, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
Subject: Re: Networked filesystems vs backing_dev_info
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:30:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193520625.27652.30.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524f69650710271402g65a9ec1cqcc7bc3a964097e39@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2157 bytes --]
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 16:02 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had me a little look at bdi usage in networked filesystems.
> >
> > NFS, CIFS, (smbfs), AFS, CODA and NCP
> >
> > And of those, NFS is the only one that I could find that creates
> > backing_dev_info structures. The rest seems to fall back to
> > default_backing_dev_info.
> >
> > With my recent per bdi dirty limit patches the bdi has become more
> > important than it has been in the past. While falling back to the
> > default_backing_dev_info isn't wrong per-se, it isn't right either.
> >
> > Could I implore the various maintainers to look into this issue for
> > their respective filesystem. I'll try and come up with some patches to
> > address this, but feel free to beat me to it.
>
> I would like to understand more about your patches to see what bdi
> values makes sense for CIFS and how to report possible congestion back
> to the page manager.
So, what my recent patches do is carve up the total writeback cache
size, or dirty page limit as we call it, proportionally to a BDIs
writeout speed. So a fast device gets more than a slow device, but will
not starve it.
However, for this to work, each device, or remote backing store in the
case of networked filesystems, need to have a BDI.
> I had been thinking about setting bdi->ra_pages
> so that we do more sensible readahead and writebehind - better
> matching what is possible over the network and what the server
> prefers.
Well, you'd first have to create backing_dev_info instances before
setting that value :-)
> SMB/CIFS Servers typically allow a maximum of 50 requests
> in parallel at one time from one client (although this is adjustable
> for some).
That seems like a perfect point to set congestion.
So in short, stick a struct backing_dev_info into whatever represents a
client, initialize it using bdi_init(), destroy using bdi_destroy().
Mark it congested once you have 50 (or more) outstanding requests, clear
congestion when you drop below 50.
and you should be set.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-27 9:34 Networked filesystems vs backing_dev_info Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 15:22 ` Jan Harkes
2007-10-27 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 21:02 ` Steve French
2007-10-27 21:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-10-27 21:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-28 7:46 ` Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193520625.27652.30.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).