From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
steved@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
rwheeler@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:26:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11990.1230560791@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> What was the result of discussions around FS-Cache? I ask because it
> reappeared in linux-next today via the nfs tree (merged into that on Dec
> 24 and 25) ...
That is the result of discussions during the kernel summit in Portland. The
discussion here is about whether Andrew agrees with adding the patches or not,
as far as I can tell. There are a number of people/companies who want them;
there is Andrew who does not.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-29 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 0:30 Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches David Howells
2008-12-18 11:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-18 14:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-18 20:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-18 23:07 ` Bernd Schubert
2008-12-18 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 4:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-29 14:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-29 14:54 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-12-29 23:05 ` Muntz, Daniel
2008-12-30 18:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-30 22:15 ` Muntz, Daniel
2008-12-30 22:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-30 23:00 ` Muntz, Daniel
2008-12-30 23:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-01-01 4:11 ` Muntz, Daniel
2009-01-01 8:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-01 18:40 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-12-31 11:15 ` David Howells
2008-12-31 9:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-29 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-29 5:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 15:01 ` David Howells
2008-12-29 15:04 ` David Howells
2008-12-29 14:26 ` David Howells [this message]
2008-12-19 2:27 ` David Howells
2008-12-19 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 3:10 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-12-19 12:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-19 16:48 ` Gabor Gombas
2008-12-19 13:32 ` David Howells
2008-12-19 3:45 ` Muntz, Daniel
2008-12-19 4:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-19 13:20 ` David Howells
2008-12-19 18:08 ` Muntz, Daniel
2008-12-19 18:24 ` David Howells
2008-12-19 19:53 ` Bryan Henderson
2008-12-20 1:20 ` David Howells
2008-12-20 6:05 ` Muntz, Daniel
2008-12-19 13:22 ` David Howells
2008-12-19 13:03 ` David Howells
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-20 6:06 Muntz, Daniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11990.1230560791@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).