From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:26:31 +0000 Message-ID: <11990.1230560791@redhat.com> References: <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> <20081218123601.11810b7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200812190007.34581.bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> <20081218152616.a24c013f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081219110539.7e7e230c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bernd Schubert , nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steved@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , rwheeler@redhat.com To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > What was the result of discussions around FS-Cache? I ask because it > reappeared in linux-next today via the nfs tree (merged into that on Dec > 24 and 25) ... That is the result of discussions during the kernel summit in Portland. The discussion here is about whether Andrew agrees with adding the patches or not, as far as I can tell. There are a number of people/companies who want them; there is Andrew who does not. David