From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mikael Davranche <mikael.davranche@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NLM: Proposal for a timeout setting on blocking locks
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:51:12 +0100
Message-ID: <1205337072.47d7fbf0f1213@imp.free.fr>
References: <1205237665.47d677a143941@imp.free.fr>  <1205277943.16687.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>  <1205321181.47d7bddd9c869@imp.free.fr> <1205328784.21679.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.36]:42422 "EHLO smtp6-g19.free.fr"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752047AbYCLPvT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1205328784.21679.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Quoting Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>:
> Yes, but that HPUX case is a very old server bug (at least 10 years
> old), and I'd assume it has been fixed by now. Even if it hasn't, I'm
> not going to bend over backwards in the client code to fix a server that
> is in obvious violation of the NLM protocol.
>
> We fix server bugs on the server and client bugs on the client.
>
> Cheers
>    Trond

Right Trond, thanks for your answers! =)

See you,

-- 
Mikael Davranche
System Engineer
Atos Worldline, France