From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gilad@codefidence.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] [BLOCK] Fix up comments about matching flags between bio and rq
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:25:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218014744.5111.41.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217957140.3454.800.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 7 ++-----
include/linux/bio.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/blkdev.h | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 0cb993a..0754a6f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -622,10 +622,6 @@ blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
blk_rq_init(q, rq);
- /*
- * first three bits are identical in rq->cmd_flags and bio->bi_rw,
- * see bio.h and blkdev.h
- */
rq->cmd_flags = rw | REQ_ALLOCED;
if (priv) {
@@ -2027,7 +2023,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_end_request_callback);
void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
struct bio *bio)
{
- /* first two bits are identical in rq->cmd_flags and bio->bi_rw */
+ /* Bit 0 (R/W) is identical in rq->cmd_flags and bio->bi_rw, and
+ we want BIO_RW_AHEAD (bit 1) to imply REQ_FAILFAST (bit 1). */
rq->cmd_flags |= (bio->bi_rw & 3);
rq->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index 67cb2ee..83f8260 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ struct bio {
* bit 5 --
* bit 6 -- discard sectors (trim)
*/
-#define BIO_RW 0
-#define BIO_RW_AHEAD 1
+#define BIO_RW 0 /* Must match RW in req flags (blkdev.h) */
+#define BIO_RW_AHEAD 1 /* Must match FAILFAST in req flags */
#define BIO_RW_BARRIER 2
#define BIO_RW_FAILFAST 3
#define BIO_RW_SYNC 4
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 9e3adc4..3f077a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ enum {
};
/*
- * request type modified bits. first three bits match BIO_RW* bits, important
+ * request type modified bits. first two bits match BIO_RW* bits, important
*/
enum rq_flag_bits {
- __REQ_RW, /* not set, read. set, write */
- __REQ_FAILFAST, /* no low level driver retries */
+ __REQ_RW, /* not set, read. set, write. SEE ABOVE */
+ __REQ_FAILFAST, /* no low level driver retries. SEE ABOVE */
__REQ_DISCARD, /* request to discard sectors */
__REQ_SORTED, /* elevator knows about this request */
__REQ_SOFTBARRIER, /* may not be passed by ioscheduler */
--
1.5.5.1
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-06 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <488B7281.4020007@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20080726130200.f541e604.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-08-05 1:45 ` [RFC] 'discard sectors' block request David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 1:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-05 9:01 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 11:42 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-05 13:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 14:21 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-08-05 16:29 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 17:25 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] [BLOCK] Add 'discard' request handling David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 16:19 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 18:18 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 19:28 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-07 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/5, v2] " David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 9:33 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 10:49 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:04 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:20 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 10:52 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:09 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:44 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:47 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:05 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 12:13 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:49 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-10 1:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-08 15:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 14:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-08 14:27 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 14:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] [FAT] Let the block device know when sectors can be discarded David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 16:40 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 17:14 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 18:11 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 19:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 19:50 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 20:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 21:37 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 16:09 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/5, v2] " David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] [MTD] Support 'discard sectors' operation in translation layer support core David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] [MTD] [FTL] Support 'discard sectors' operation David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218014744.5111.41.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gilad@codefidence.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).