From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.16 released
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0200
Message-ID: <1218100464.8625.9.camel@twins>
References: <1217962876.15342.33.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1217962876.15342.33.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 15:01 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:

> There are still more disk format changes planned, but we're making every
> effort to get them out of the way as quickly as we can.  You can see the
> major features we have planned on the development timeline:
> 
> http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Development_timeline

Just took a peek, seems to be slightly out of date as it still lists the
single mutex thingy.

Also, how true is the IO-error and disk-full claim?