linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux-iSCSI.org Target Dev"
	<linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	SCST-Devel <scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ConfigFS]: Allow symbolic links from a SysFS struct kobject source.
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:22:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224231739.5556.303.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081017074453.GA4850@kroah.com>

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 00:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:55:55PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Hi Joel, Greg and Co,
> > 
> > Here is the the first working code for allowing configfs to handle
> > symlinks from sysfs struct kobject based code.  Here is the commit:
> > passing struct kobject into generic target_core_mod subsystem plugins
> > for locating struct block_device and struct scsi_device..  
> 
> Um, no.
> 
> You are trying to create symlinks dynamically across superblocks and
> mount points?  As one of your #warning states, this isn't possible to do
> correctly, nor is it even a good idea.
> 
> So I'd have to reject this patch, sorry.
> 
> What is the problem you are attempting to solve here?
> 

So, the generic target_core_mod engine that lives
under /sys/kernel/config/target/core needs a method to locate struct
block_device and struct scsi_device for access via bio_submit() and
scsi_execute_() respectively.

Originally, target_core_mod used key echoed through configfs attributes
like so:

export TARGET=/sys/kernel/config/target/core/

# Create $STORAGE_OBJECT of type Linux/BLOCK in generic target_core_mod
mkdir -p $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0
# OLD METHOD to reference struct block_device
echo iblock_major=254,iblock_minor=2 > $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0/control
echo 1 > $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0/enable
# NEW METHOD using sysfs ->configfs symlinks to reference struct block_device
ln -s /sys/block/dm-2 $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0/dm-2

# Create $STORAGE_OBJET of type Linux/SCSI in generic target_core_mod
mkdir -p $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd
# OLD METHOD to reference struct scsi_device
echo scsi_channel_id=0,scsi_target_id=3,scsi_lun_id=0 > $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd/control
echo 1 > $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd/enable
# NEW METHOD using sysfs -> configfs symlinks to reference struct scsi_device
ln -s /sys/block/sdd/device $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd/passthrough

This of course means that non TYPE_DISK of struct scsi_device would need
to appear under /sys/ to be referenced using the symlink method..  I
know that drivers/scsi/sr.c currently does not show up under /sys..

Anyways, the idea is that its *ONLY* this special case for struct
kobject as symlink source to struct config_item as symlink destination
through the config struct config_item_operations API..  For the generic
target_core_mod engine case, it seems like a good method to reference
block and scsi related data structures for struct devices that folks
want to use for target export across one or more $FABRIC modules (iSCSI,
SAS, FC, PSCSI, etc)..

I am more than happy to change the patch if there is a better way to get
the same functionality for target_core_mod  I would really not prefer
having to do targetfs, when configfs + sysfs symlinks seems to work in
my first few hours of testing, unless there is something huge that I am
missing..?.

The other point is that since configfs is based on sysfs code, it only
makes sense to provide a API through configfs to take advantage of
kernel data structures that can be referenced using wrappers to
container_of() in include/linux/ in a common way.

--nab

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-17  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-17  6:55 [PATCH] [ConfigFS]: Allow symbolic links from a SysFS struct kobject source Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-10-17  7:44 ` Greg KH
2008-10-17  8:22   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2008-10-17 11:32     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-17 19:02       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-10-17 17:39     ` Greg KH
2008-10-17 19:19       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-10-17 20:10         ` Greg KH
2008-10-18  2:41           ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-10-17 19:48     ` Joel Becker
2008-10-17 20:03       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-10-17 20:07       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-10-17 19:39 ` Joel Becker
2008-10-17 19:50   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1224231739.5556.303.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
    --to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).