From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subrata Modak Subject: Re: [LTP] [rfc patch 0/4] splice: cleanups and fixes Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:11:19 +0530 Message-ID: <1224679281.9160.49.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> References: <20080621154607.154640724@szeredi.hu> <1214068808.5607.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1214234765.4719.99.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1214399828.10818.22.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1214465694.5575.15.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "jens.axboe" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:34378 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195AbYJVMlp (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:41:45 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9MCfjDr007407 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:41:45 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9MCfiIE123278 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:41:44 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9MCfiAd029871 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:41:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1214465694.5575.15.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Miklos, On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 13:04 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:00 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > Would you also like to provide some wonderful feedback for the > > > vmsplice() syscall test cases like the way you provided for the splice() > > > test cases? > > > > I haven't looked at vmsplice() yet. I think Jens would be in a better > > position to provide such feedback. > > Thanks Miklos. I would also request feedback from Jens as well. > > Hi Jens, > > Miklos has recently helped us review the spilce() syscall test cases in > LTP, available at: > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/splice/ > and has provided us valuable feedback on improvements of these test > cases on the following lines: > > > > Well, there's probably lot more different tests that could be done: > > > > > > - splicing from various sources (socket, pipe, regular file) > > > - splicing to various sources (...) > > > - splicing in full page(s) > > > - splicing in partial page(s) > > > - filling the destination pipe (blocking/nonblocking) > > > - splicing in a big buffer (bigger than the pipe buffer) > > > - splicing out full buffers > > > - splicing out partial buffers > > > - splicing out multiple buffers > > > - splicing out more data then is in the pipe (blocking/nonblocking) > > > - parallel splicing (in and/or out) > > > > > I would request you to kindly help us review the vmspilce() syscall test > cases in LTP, and also give us review feedback and improvements on the > same: > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/vmsplice/ Would you like to provide us some feedback here. Regards-- Subrata > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > > > Thanks, > > Miklos > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list