From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
autofs@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:02:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225155737.2938.17.camel@zeus.themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225153622.2938.1.camel@zeus.themaw.net>
This response is a bit confusing, let me try to fix that.
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:27 +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:35:22 +0800
> > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remove unnecessary string terminator check.
> >
> > Why is it unnecessary?
> >
> > Does this change alter behaviour in any way?
> >
> > Does it fix a bug?
>
> Umm .... it was done in response to your comment, quoted below ...
>
<quote>
> > +/*
> > + * Check a string doesn't overrun the chunk of
> > + * memory we copied from user land.
> > + */
> > +static int invalid_str(char *str, void *end)
> > +{
> > + while ((void *) str <= end)
> > + if (!*str++)
> > + return 0;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
>
> What is this? We copy strings in from userspace in 10000 different
> places without needing checks such as this?
</quote>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-28 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 2:35 [PATCH 1/6] autofs4 - correct offset mount expire check Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check Ian Kent
2008-10-27 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28 0:27 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 0:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28 1:04 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 1:02 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs4 - collect version check return Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] autofs4 - make autofs type usage explicit Ian Kent
2008-10-27 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28 0:28 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 13:24 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] autofs4 - improve parameter usage Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] autofs4 - cleanup expire code duplication Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1225155737.2938.17.camel@zeus.themaw.net \
--to=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).