From: Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: truncate blocks outside i_size after O_DIRECT write error.
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:32:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228051966-23866-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>
In case of error extending write may have instantiated a few blocks
outside i_size. We need to trim these blocks. We have to do it *regardless*
to blocksize. At least ext2, ext3 and reiserfs interpret
(i_size < biggest block) condition as error. Fsck will complain about wrong
i_size. Then fsck will fix the error by changing i_size according to the
biggest block. This is bad because this blocks contain garbage from previous
write attempt. And result in data corruption.
Changes from previous version:
- Move error handling from generic mm code to __blockdev_direct_IO(). As soon
as i remember this is 11'th version of the patch, and now finally it looks
simple and clean.
####TESTCASE_BEGIN
$touch /mnt/test/BIG_FILE
## at this moment /mnt/test/BIG_FILE size and blocks equal to zero
open("/mnt/test/BIG_FILE", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_DIRECT, 0666) = 3
write(3, "aaaaaaaaaaaa"..., 104857600) = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on device)
## size and block sould't be changed because write op failed.
$stat /mnt/test/BIG_FILE
File: `/mnt/test/BIG_FILE'
Size: 0 Blocks: 110896 IO Block: 1024 regular empty file
<<<<<<<<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^file size is less than biggest block idx
Device: fe07h/65031d Inode: 14 Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2007-01-24 20:03:38.000000000 +0300
Modify: 2007-01-24 20:03:38.000000000 +0300
Change: 2007-01-24 20:03:39.000000000 +0300
#fsck.ext3 -f /dev/VG/test
e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 14, i_size is 0, should be 56556544. Fix<y>? yes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
....
#####TESTCASE_ENDdiff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index af0558d..4e88bea 100644
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
---
fs/direct-io.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index af0558d..4e88bea 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1209,6 +1209,16 @@ __blockdev_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
retval = direct_io_worker(rw, iocb, inode, iov, offset,
nr_segs, blkbits, get_block, end_io, dio);
+ /*
+ * In case of error extending write may have instantiated a few
+ * blocks outside i_size. Trim these off again for DIO_LOCKING.
+ * NOTE: DIO_NO_LOCK/DIO_OWN_LOCK callers have to handle this by
+ * it's own meaner.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(retval < 0 && (rw & WRITE) && (end > i_size_read(inode))
+ && dio_lock_type == DIO_LOCKING))
+ vmtruncate(inode, inode->i_size);
+
if (rw == READ && dio_lock_type == DIO_LOCKING)
release_i_mutex = 0;
--
1.5.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2008-11-30 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-30 13:32 Dmitri Monakhov [this message]
2008-12-02 23:58 ` [PATCH] fs: truncate blocks outside i_size after O_DIRECT write error Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228051966-23866-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).