From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harvey Harrison Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:13:33 -0800 Message-ID: <1231539213.5825.4.camel@brick> References: <1231434515.14304.27.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20090108183306.GA22916@elte.hu> <20090108190038.GH496@one.firstfloor.org> <4966AB74.2090104@zytor.com> <20090109133710.GB31845@elte.hu> <20090109204103.GA17212@elte.hu> <20090109213442.GA20051@elte.hu> <1231537320.5726.2.camel@brick> <1231538387.5825.2.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:51087 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759411AbZAIWNg (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:13:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 14:09 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > We have a few users of "__inline", but not very many. We can leave them > alone, or just convert them to __inline__ or inline. Actually I sent out a series of patches which mostly went in 2.6.27-28 timeframe, that's why there's a lot fewer __inline/__inline__ Other than one more block in scsi which has been hanging out in -mm for awhile, eliminating them should be pretty easy now. Harvey