From: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: lkml-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
nfsv4-6DNke4IJHB0gsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org,
cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:34:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232555691-29859-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232555691-29859-1-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
dlm_posix_get fills out the relevant fields in the file_lock before
returning when there is a lock conflict, but doesn't clean out any of
the other fields in the file_lock.
When nfsd does a NFSv4 lockt call, it sets the fl_lmops to
nfsd_posix_mng_ops before calling the lower fs. When the lock comes back
after testing a lock on GFS2, it still has that field set. This confuses
nfsd into thinking that the file_lock is a nfsd4 lock.
Fix this by making DLM reinitialize the file_lock before copying the
fields from the conflicting lock.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index eba87ff..ca46f11 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
@@ -304,7 +304,9 @@ int dlm_posix_get(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
if (rv == -ENOENT)
rv = 0;
else if (rv > 0) {
+ locks_init_lock(fl);
fl->fl_type = (op->info.ex) ? F_WRLCK : F_RDLCK;
+ fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
fl->fl_pid = op->info.pid;
fl->fl_start = op->info.start;
fl->fl_end = op->info.end;
--
1.5.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 16:34 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call on GFS2 (regression) Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <1232555691-29859-1-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-21 16:34 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2009-01-21 23:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 2:26 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:05 ` [Cluster-devel] " David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20090122133733.5d692a09-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-22 19:03 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:58 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20090122135838.7aa9d9f3-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-22 19:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:59 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:09 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20090122140902.0cedf21b-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-22 19:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-22 19:16 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <1232651764-10799-2-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-27 22:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-27 23:30 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1232555691-29859-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lkml-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nfsv4-6DNke4IJHB0gsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).