From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:16:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232651764-10799-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
This patchset fixes a regression due to this patch:
----------------[snip]----------------
commit 55ef1274dddd4de387c54d110e354ffbb6cdc706
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Sat Dec 20 11:58:38 2008 -0800
nfsd: Ensure nfsv4 calls the underlying filesystem on LOCKT
----------------[snip]----------------
To reproduce, set up a nfs server that is serving out a GFS2 filesystem.
Set a lock locally on a file on the GFS2 export on the server. From a
NFSv4 client, do a GETLK against the same file. The server will oops due
to a NULL pointer dereference. The fl_lmops will be set, but the
fl_owner will be a NULL pointer. The knfsd code does not account for
this possibility. It assumes that when fl_lmops is set this way that
the fl_owner will point to a valid nfs4_stateowner struct.
In actuality, Bruce's patch is correct, but it exposes a bug in DLM's
GETLK codepath. The first patch in this set fixes that.
The second patch fixes knfsd to be a little more careful about the
file_lock struct it builds to pass to vfs_test_lock.
Either patch should prevent the panic, though I think applying both
patches is the best approach to fixing this.
Jeff Layton (2):
dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting
lock
nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is
found
fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 ++
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 19:16 Jeff Layton [this message]
2009-01-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <1232651764-10799-2-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-27 22:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-27 23:30 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found Jeff Layton
2009-01-27 22:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 19:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1232651764-10799-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).